Ink LearningBiologyPracticalsExam boards

BiologyNucleic acids, genomes and protein synthesis › DNA replication: one old strand in every new molecule

DNA replication: one old strand in every new molecule

Every time a cell divides it must produce two complete copies of about 3.1 billion base pairs, and get almost all of them right. The mechanism that manages it keeps one original strand in each new molecule, and the experiment that proved it is one of the cleanest in biology.

Before this DNA structure and complementary base pairing · Enzymes and the induced fit model · ATP as an energy currency

Before you start

DNA replication copies one strand, and the copy becomes the new molecule — so after replication you have the old molecule and a brand new one sitting beside it. It is a tidy picture and it is the model biologists called conservative, and it is wrong. Both strands are used as templates at the same time, and each new molecule ends up as one original strand paired with one newly built one. There is no untouched parent molecule afterwards, and no molecule made entirely from scratch. Every daughter is a hybrid, which is why the process is called semi-conservative.

What you should be able to do

What 'semi-conservative' actually claims

Before the mechanism was known, three models were on the table. The conservative model said the original double helix stayed intact and an entirely new one was built alongside it. The dispersive model said the new molecules were patchworks, with stretches of old and new sequence scattered along both strands. The semi-conservative model said the two strands separate, each acts as a template, and each new molecule contains one original strand and one new one.

Follow the blue strands. There are two of them at the start and there are still two of them at the end, because replication copies DNA rather than consuming it. After two rounds, half the molecules contain no original material at all — but the two original strands are still in there, in separate molecules.

The word semi-conservative is doing exact work: half of each daughter molecule is conserved from the parent. Say that in an answer and you have the mark. Say 'half the DNA is conserved' and you have said something vaguer and, after several generations, untrue.

Semi-conservative replication
Replication in which the two strands of the parent molecule separate and each acts as a template, so every daughter molecule contains one original strand and one newly synthesised strand.
Template strand
A strand of DNA whose base sequence determines the sequence of the new strand built against it.

Unzipping, then building

Replication begins when DNA helicase travels along the molecule and breaks the hydrogen bonds between paired bases. The two strands separate and the helix unwinds, exposing the bases. Notice which bonds are broken: hydrogen bonds, across the molecule. The phosphodiester bonds along each backbone are covalent and are left alone, which is exactly why the strands come apart as two intact strands rather than as debris.

Free DNA nucleotides, already present in the nucleoplasm, then align against the exposed bases by complementary base pairing. An adenine on the template attracts a thymine nucleotide and nothing else; a cytosine attracts a guanine. The specificity of the pairing is what makes the copy accurate, and the accuracy is not a separate mechanism bolted on — it falls out of the chemistry of the bases.

DNA polymerase then catalyses the condensation reactions that join the aligned nucleotides into a continuous strand, forming a phosphodiester bond between each one and the next. The free nucleotides arrive as nucleoside triphosphates, so the energy for each bond comes from the two extra phosphates being released as the bond forms.

The single constraint that shapes everything: DNA polymerase can only add a nucleotide to a free 3′ end. On one template that means working steadily behind the fork; on the other it means starting again and again, and working backwards in short pieces.

DNA polymerase can only build a strand in the 5′ to 3′ direction, because it can only attach a new nucleotide to a free 3′ hydroxyl group. The two template strands are antiparallel, so the enzyme cannot travel the same way along both. On one template it moves in the direction the fork is opening, and produces one long unbroken leading strand. On the other it must work away from the fork, so it waits for a stretch of template to be exposed, copies backwards along it, then jumps forward and does it again. The result is the lagging strand: a series of short pieces called Okazaki fragments, typically 100 to 200 nucleotides long in eukaryotes, which DNA ligase later joins into one continuous strand.

Leading strandLagging strand
Direction of synthesis5′ to 3′5′ to 3′ — the same, always
Relative to the forkToward it, following the openingAway from it, working backwards
ContinuityOne continuous pieceShort Okazaki fragments
Extra enzyme neededNone beyond polymeraseDNA ligase, to seal the fragments

The commonest confusion here is thinking the lagging strand is built 3′ to 5′. It is not. Both new strands are built 5′ to 3′ without exception. What differs is the direction of travel relative to the fork, and that is what forces one of them into fragments.

Meselson and Stahl: how the argument was settled

In 1958 Matthew Meselson and Franklin Stahl found a way to tell the three models apart by weight. They grew E. coli for many generations in a medium whose only nitrogen source was the heavy isotope ¹⁵N. Nitrogen is in every base, so the bacteria built DNA that was measurably denser than normal. They then transferred the culture to a medium containing only ordinary ¹⁴N, so every nucleotide made from that point on was light, and sampled the DNA after each round of division.

Spinning the extracted DNA in a caesium chloride solution at very high speed sets up a density gradient, and each DNA molecule settles at the depth matching its own density. Heavy DNA sinks furthest. Light DNA stays highest. A hybrid molecule, one heavy strand and one light, settles halfway between.

Three predictions, drawn as the tubes would have looked. Only one column matches what came out of the centrifuge, and it takes both generations to narrow it to one: generation 1 eliminates the conservative model, generation 2 eliminates the dispersive one.

After one generation there was a single band, and it sat exactly halfway between the heavy and light positions. The conservative model dies here. It predicts the original heavy molecule survives untouched and an entirely light molecule is built beside it, giving two bands — one heavy, one light — and no intermediate band at all. A conservative mechanism cannot produce a molecule of mixed density, because it never puts old and new material in the same molecule. One intermediate band and no heavy band rules it out outright.

That result alone does not distinguish semi-conservative from dispersive, because a patchwork molecule of half-old, half-new sequence would also be of intermediate density. The second generation separates them. The semi-conservative model predicts two bands: half the molecules still contain one heavy strand and stay intermediate, while half are now entirely light. The dispersive model predicts one band again, this time three quarters of the way toward light, because every molecule is still an even mixture. Two distinct bands appeared. Dispersive replication was finished.

Predicting the third generation

Continue the experiment for one more division. What proportion of the DNA would be in the intermediate band and what proportion in the light band after three generations in ¹⁴N medium, and why does the intermediate band never disappear?

Count strands rather than molecules. There are two original heavy strands and they are never destroyed, so exactly two molecules in every generation contain one.

After three generations there are 2³ = 8 molecules. Two of them contain a heavy strand and are therefore intermediate; the other six are entirely light. The intermediate band holds 2/8, or 25% of the DNA and the light band holds 6/8, or 75%.

The intermediate band gets fainter every generation but never vanishes, because the two original strands persist indefinitely — they are simply diluted among more and more molecules. If you were told the intermediate band had disappeared entirely, semi-conservative replication would be in trouble.

When the copying goes wrong

Human DNA polymerase makes roughly one error per billion base pairs copied, after its own proofreading has corrected most of what it got wrong. That is remarkable accuracy, and across 3.1 billion base pairs it still means a handful of new errors in every cell division.

An uncorrected error is a mutation: a change in the base sequence of DNA. A base substitution swaps one base for another. An insertion or deletion adds or removes one, which shifts the reading of everything downstream and is usually far more damaging. Mutations also arise from mutagens — ultraviolet light, some chemicals in tobacco smoke, ionising radiation — rather than from replication alone.

Mutation
A change in the base sequence of DNA.
Substitution
A mutation in which one base is replaced by another.
Deletion
A mutation in which a base is lost, shifting the reading of every triplet that follows.

Most mutations have no effect. Some fall in non-coding stretches of DNA. Some change a triplet into another triplet coding for the same amino acid, which the next lesson explains. Some change an amino acid in a region of the protein where the substitution makes no difference to the folded shape. A minority land somewhere that matters, and of those a few are useful, which is where the variation that natural selection acts on comes from.

The classic example is worth quoting precisely: in sickle-cell anaemia a single base substitution in the gene for the β-globin chain of haemoglobin changes one triplet, one amino acid changes from glutamic acid to valine, and the altered haemoglobin polymerises at low oxygen concentrations and distorts the red blood cell. The gene sits on chromosome 11, so that is one base out of about 135 million on that chromosome.

TRY IT — Explaining why a control was necessary

Meselson and Stahl also ran a control in which they mixed extracted heavy DNA with extracted light DNA and spun the mixture. Suggest why this control was needed, and what result would have made their main conclusion unsafe.

Check your answer

The control shows that the centrifuge can resolve heavy DNA from light DNA as two separate bands in the same tube.

Without it, the single intermediate band seen after one generation could have been explained away as a mixture of heavy and light molecules that the technique was simply not sensitive enough to separate. The control removes that explanation: the two densities plainly do separate when both are present, so one band means one density.

If the mixture had produced a single band in the intermediate position, the method would have been shown incapable of telling the models apart, and no conclusion could have been drawn from the main result at all.

In the exam

Check yourself

A student claims that after two generations in light medium, a conservative model and a semi-conservative model would give the same result, so the experiment proves nothing. Explain why the student is wrong, using the position and number of the bands.

Answer

The two models differ at the first generation, and they differ again at the second, so at no point do they predict the same thing.

After one generation the conservative model predicts two bands: the original heavy molecule intact at the bottom of the gradient and a completely new light molecule at the top, with nothing between them. The semi-conservative model predicts one band only, sitting midway, because every molecule is one heavy strand paired with one light one. A single intermediate band was what appeared, so the conservative model was already dead.

After two generations the conservative model would still show a heavy band, since the original molecule is never taken apart under that model. The semi-conservative model predicts no heavy DNA at all: two intermediate molecules and two light ones, giving two bands, one midway and one at the light position. That is what was seen.

The student has confused 'both models predict some light DNA' with 'both models predict the same bands'. The persistence of a heavy band is the difference, and it was absent.

Questions

Written to the command words the boards use. Try them on paper before opening a scheme: the marks go to points made, not to length.

Question 15 marks

Describe how a molecule of DNA is copied semi-conservatively, naming the enzymes involved and the bonds that are broken and formed.

Mark scheme
  1. B1 DNA helicase breaks the hydrogen bonds between complementary bases, so the two strands separate and the helix unwinds
  2. B1 each of the two separated strands acts as a template
  3. B1 free DNA nucleotides align against the exposed bases by complementary base pairing, adenine to thymine and cytosine to guanine
  4. B1 DNA polymerase catalyses the condensation reactions that join the aligned nucleotides, forming phosphodiester bonds along the new backbone
  5. A1 each daughter molecule ends up with one original strand and one newly synthesised strand, which is what semi-conservative means

Question 24 marks

Explain why one of the two new DNA strands is built continuously while the other is built as a series of short fragments.

Mark scheme
  1. B1 DNA polymerase can only attach a nucleotide to a free 3′ hydroxyl group, so it can only build a strand in the 5′ to 3′ direction
  2. B1 the two template strands are antiparallel, so the enzyme cannot travel the same way along both of them
  3. B1 on one template it moves in the direction the replication fork is opening, producing one continuous leading strand
  4. B1 on the other it must work away from the fork, so it waits for template to be exposed and copies a short piece backwards each time, giving the Okazaki fragments of the lagging strand

Question 33 marks

Bacteria whose DNA contains only ¹⁵N are transferred to a medium containing only ¹⁴N and allowed to divide four times. Calculate the percentage of the DNA molecules that still contain a ¹⁵N strand.

Mark scheme
  1. M1 the two original heavy strands are never destroyed, so exactly two molecules contain one
  2. M1 after four divisions there are 2⁴ = 16 molecules altogether, so the proportion is 2 ÷ 16
  3. A1 12.5 per cent of the molecules contain a ¹⁵N strand, the remaining 87.5 per cent being entirely light

Question 43 marks

DNA polymerase corrects most of its own copying errors, but a few substitutions survive in every cell division. Suggest three reasons why such a substitution often has no effect on the organism.

Mark scheme
  1. B1 the substitution may fall in a non-coding stretch of DNA, so no polypeptide is affected by it
  2. B1 the altered triplet may code for the same amino acid as the original, so the polypeptide is unchanged
  3. B1 the amino acid may change in a region of the protein where the substitution makes no difference to the folded shape, so the protein still functions

Question 52 marks

State the role of DNA helicase and state the role of DNA ligase in the replication of a DNA molecule.

Mark scheme
  1. B1 helicase breaks the hydrogen bonds between the paired bases, so the two strands separate and the helix unwinds
  2. B1 ligase joins the Okazaki fragments of the lagging strand into one continuous strand, forming the phosphodiester bonds between them

Worth remembering

← DNA and RNA: four letters and a rule about pairing · The genetic code, and getting a gene out of the nucleus →