Practise › Questions › Induction: divisibility and matrices
Induction: divisibility and matrices questions
The same induction argument applied to two further kinds of statement. Expressions that stay divisible by a fixed number, and matrix powers that follow a pattern.
7 original questions · 30 marks · the induction: divisibility and matrices notes · Further proof
Every question here is written for this library rather than taken from a past paper. Write your answer out before opening the worked one: the answers award marks point by point, and the marks are easier to see when you have something of your own to compare against.
Let f(n) = 8n − 1. Show that f(1) is divisible by 7, and write down the inductive hypothesis for the claim that 7 divides f(n) for all positive integers n.
Worked answer
f(1) = 8 − 1 = 7, which is divisible by 7. Hypothesis: assume f(k) = 8k − 1 is divisible by 7 for some positive integer k. B1 for the base case, B1 for the hypothesis.Using f(n) = 8n − 1, simplify f(k + 1) − 8f(k) and hence complete the divisibility proof.
Worked answer
f(k + 1) − 8f(k) = (8k+1 − 1) − (8k+1 − 8) = 7. So f(k + 1) = 8f(k) + 7, a multiple of 7 plus 7, and so divisible by 7. With the base case, 7 divides 8n − 1 for all n. M1 for forming f(k + 1) − 8f(k), A1 for the constant remainder, A1 for the conclusion.Prove by induction that 32n + 7 is divisible by 8 for all positive integers n.
Worked answer
Base: 3² + 7 = 16 = 8 × 2. Step: with f(k) = 32k + 7 assumed divisible by 8, f(k + 1) = 9 × 32k + 7 = 9f(k) − 56. Both terms are multiples of 8 (56 = 8 × 7), so f(k + 1) is too. B1 for the base case, M1 for writing f(k + 1) in terms of f(k), A1 for 9f(k) − 56, A1 for both terms being multiples of 8, A1 for the conclusion. The multiplier 9 comes from 32(k+1) = 9 × 32k: each step multiplies the power part by 9.Let M be the matrix with rows (1, 1) and (0, 1). Prove by induction that Mn has rows (1, n) and (0, 1).
Worked answer
Base: M¹ has rows (1, 1), (0, 1), matching n = 1. Step: assume Mk has rows (1, k), (0, 1). Then Mk+1 = MkM multiplies to rows (1, k + 1), (0, 1), since the top-right entry is 1 × 1 + k × 1 = k + 1 and the rest are unchanged. So the pattern holds for all n. B1 for the base case, M1 for writing Mk+1 = MkM, A1 for the top-right entry, A1 for the required form, A1 for the conclusion. The shear just accumulates its slide.Let D be the matrix with rows (2, 0) and (0, 3). Prove by induction that Dn has rows (2n, 0) and (0, 3n).
Worked answer
Base: D¹ has rows (2, 0), (0, 3) = (2¹, 0), (0, 3¹). Step: assume the result at k; multiplying by D scales the top-left entry by 2 and the bottom-right by 3, giving 2k+1 and 3k+1 with the zeros preserved. B1 for the base case, M1 for multiplying by D, A1 for the top-left entry, A1 for the bottom-right entry, A1 for the conclusion. Diagonal matrices power entry by entry, and induction is how that sentence is earned.In divisibility proofs the working often forms f(k + 1) − m f(k) for a chosen multiplier m. Explain how m is chosen, and why the manoeuvre works.
Worked answer
Choose m to match the growth of the power term, so the powers cancel. For 8n − 1 take m = 8, for 32n + 7 take m = 9. What remains is a constant, and if that constant is divisible by the target then f(k + 1) = m f(k) + constant inherits divisibility from the hypothesis. B1 for choosing m to match the growth of the power term, B1 for the powers cancelling to leave a constant, B1 for that constant carrying the divisibility.M is the matrix with rows (3, −4) and (1, −1). Prove by induction that Mn has rows (1 + 2n, −4n) and (n, 1 − 2n) for all positive integers n.
Worked answer
Base: at n = 1 the formula gives rows (3, −4) and (1, −1), which is M. Step: assume Mk has rows (1 + 2k, −4k) and (k, 1 − 2k). Then Mk+1 = MkM, and the four entries are 3(1 + 2k) − 4k = 3 + 2k, −4(1 + 2k) + 4k = −4 − 4k, 3k + (1 − 2k) = k + 1 and −4k − (1 − 2k) = −1 − 2k. Rewriting, 3 + 2k = 1 + 2(k + 1), −4 − 4k = −4(k + 1) and −1 − 2k = 1 − 2(k + 1), so the rows are (1 + 2(k + 1), −4(k + 1)) and (k + 1, 1 − 2(k + 1)), the formula at n = k + 1. True at n = 1 and inherited at every step, so true for all positive integers n. B1 for the base case, M1 for forming MkM, M1 for at least one correct entry, A1 A1 for all four entries, A1 for rewriting them in terms of k + 1, A1 for the conclusion. Write Mk+1 as MkM rather than MMk and the hypothesis sits ready on the left; either order works here, but matrices do not commute in general, so the product is worth writing down explicitly rather than assuming.
The same practice on paper: the printable workbook for this topic, questions and a worked answer book.
Practise induction: divisibility and matrices one question at a time
The player marks nothing for you. It shows one question, waits, then shows the worked answer so you can mark yourself, and brings a question back sooner when it went badly.